Overview¶
The ceph-volume tool aims to be a single purpose command line tool to deploy
logical volumes as OSDs, trying to maintain a similar API to ceph-disk when
preparing, activating, and creating OSDs.
It deviates from ceph-disk by not interacting or relying on the udev rules
that come installed for Ceph. These rules allow automatic detection of
previously setup devices that are in turn fed into ceph-disk to activate
them.
Replacing ceph-disk¶
The ceph-disk tool was created at a time were the project was required to
support many different types of init systems (upstart, sysvinit, etc…) while
being able to discover devices. This caused the tool to concentrate initially
(and exclusively afterwards) on GPT partitions. Specifically on GPT GUIDs,
which were used to label devices in a unique way to answer questions like:
is this device a Journal?
an encrypted data partition?
was the device left partially prepared?
To solve these, it used UDEV rules to match the GUIDs, that would call
ceph-disk, and end up in a back and forth between the ceph-disk systemd
unit and the ceph-disk executable. The process was very unreliable and time
consuming (a timeout of close to three hours per OSD had to be put in
place), and would cause OSDs to not come up at all during the boot process of
a node.
It was hard to debug, or even replicate these problems given the asynchronous
behavior of UDEV.
Since the world-view of ceph-disk had to be GPT partitions exclusively, it meant
that it couldn’t work with other technologies like LVM, or similar device
mapper devices. It was ultimately decided to create something modular, starting
with LVM support, and the ability to expand on other technologies as needed.
GPT partitions are simple?¶
Although partitions in general are simple to reason about, ceph-disk
partitions were not simple by any means. It required a tremendous amount of
special flags in order to get them to work correctly with the device discovery
workflow. Here is an example call to create a data partition:
/sbin/sgdisk --largest-new=1 --change-name=1:ceph data --partition-guid=1:f0fc39fd-eeb2-49f1-b922-a11939cf8a0f --typecode=1:89c57f98-2fe5-4dc0-89c1-f3ad0ceff2be --mbrtogpt -- /dev/sdb
Not only creating these was hard, but these partitions required devices to be
exclusively owned by Ceph. For example, in some cases a special partition would
be created when devices were encrypted, which would contain unencrypted keys.
This was ceph-disk domain knowledge, which would not translate to a “GPT
partitions are simple” understanding. Here is an example of that special
partition being created:
/sbin/sgdisk --new=5:0:+10M --change-name=5:ceph lockbox --partition-guid=5:None --typecode=5:fb3aabf9-d25f-47cc-bf5e-721d181642be --mbrtogpt -- /dev/sdad
Modularity¶
ceph-volume was designed to be a modular tool because we anticipate that
there are going to be lots of ways that people provision the hardware devices
that we need to consider. There are already two: legacy ceph-disk devices that
are still in use and have GPT partitions (handled by simple),
and lvm. SPDK devices where we manage NVMe devices directly from userspace are
on the immediate horizon, where LVM won’t work there since the kernel isn’t
involved at all.
ceph-volume lvm¶
By making use of LVM tags, the lvm sub-command is able to store and later re-discover and query devices associated with OSDs so that they can later activated. This includes support for lvm-based technologies like dm-cache as well.
对 ceph-volume 来说， dm-cache 的使用是透明的，对这个工具来说没什么不一样的地方，它把 dm-cache 当作一般的逻辑卷。
LVM performance penalty¶
In short: we haven’t been able to notice any significant performance penalties
associated with the change to LVM. By being able to work closely with LVM, the
ability to work with other device mapper technologies (for example dmcache)
was a given: there is no technical difficulty in working with anything that can
sit below a Logical Volume.
